<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbritage and the Forever Stamp</title>
	<link>http://statastic.com/2007/05/14/arbritage-and-the-forever-stamp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Statastico</title>
		<link>http://statastic.com/2007/05/14/arbritage-and-the-forever-stamp/#comment-4642</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://statastic.com/2007/05/14/arbritage-and-the-forever-stamp/#comment-4642</guid>
					<description>A pre-emptive note: 
It seems unlikely that a speculator would find a guaranteed futures contract  for 41.9 cents per stamp (after all, why not just buy the $.41 stamps yourself?).  

Nonetheless, there will be some period where a secondary market crops up where forever stamps will be sold at less than the official new rate.  How long and the price will be determined by the existing supply of $.41 forever stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pre-emptive note:<br />
It seems unlikely that a speculator would find a guaranteed futures contract  for 41.9 cents per stamp (after all, why not just buy the $.41 stamps yourself?).  </p>
<p>Nonetheless, there will be some period where a secondary market crops up where forever stamps will be sold at less than the official new rate.  How long and the price will be determined by the existing supply of $.41 forever stamps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
