<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s the Wikipedi-est of Them All?</title>
	<link>http://statastic.com/2006/08/09/who-is-the-wikipedi-est-of-them-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Statastico</title>
		<link>http://statastic.com/2006/08/09/who-is-the-wikipedi-est-of-them-all/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://statastic.com/2006/08/09/who-is-the-wikipedi-est-of-them-all/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Diminishing returns is indeed important, but I'm not sure that we've hit that point on the curve just yet with regards to Wikipedia entries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent Atlantic Monthly &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;The Atlantic Monthly - &quot; href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; quoted a Polish &lt;font class=&quot;arttype&quot;&gt;Wikipedian named Krzysztof Jasiutowicz as saying that the Internet was nothing but a &quot;global Wikipedia without the end-user editing facility.&quot;  So if Wikipedia ends up reflecting the number of web pages, there are millions of entries left to write in the English Wikipedia.  True, the English Wikipedians have picked the low-hanging fruit.  But the numbers don't necessarily reflect the law of diminishing returns just yet.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's the &lt;a href=&quot;http://static.flickr.com/97/211953486_3bd8ea0bfc_o.png&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia Entries by Language&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;data for the top 25 Wikipedia languages by number of entries&lt;/a&gt;, per capita, and per Internet user (which puts low-income, high-population countries like China on more equal footing).  Despite the law of diminishing returns, you'll notice that the Scandinavian languages still have a much higher participation rate compared to Wikipedias with a similar number of entries.  There are some other obvious factors at work here: percentage of workforce at desk jobs, GDP per capita, and the date that Wikipedia was started in their language.  Though I'm not sure what explains the relatively low participation rate in Japan.  And Korea didn't even make the top 25.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diminishing returns is indeed important, but I&#8217;m not sure that we&#8217;ve hit that point on the curve just yet with regards to Wikipedia entries.</p>
<p>A recent Atlantic Monthly <a target="_blank" title="The Atlantic Monthly - " href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609/wikipedia" rel="nofollow">article</a> quoted a Polish <font class="arttype">Wikipedian named Krzysztof Jasiutowicz as saying that the Internet was nothing but a &#8220;global Wikipedia without the end-user editing facility.&#8221;  So if Wikipedia ends up reflecting the number of web pages, there are millions of entries left to write in the English Wikipedia.  True, the English Wikipedians have picked the low-hanging fruit.  But the numbers don&#8217;t necessarily reflect the law of diminishing returns just yet.</font></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://static.flickr.com/97/211953486_3bd8ea0bfc_o.png" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia Entries by Language" rel="nofollow">data for the top 25 Wikipedia languages by number of entries</a>, per capita, and per Internet user (which puts low-income, high-population countries like China on more equal footing).  Despite the law of diminishing returns, you&#8217;ll notice that the Scandinavian languages still have a much higher participation rate compared to Wikipedias with a similar number of entries.  There are some other obvious factors at work here: percentage of workforce at desk jobs, GDP per capita, and the date that Wikipedia was started in their language.  Though I&#8217;m not sure what explains the relatively low participation rate in Japan.  And Korea didn&#8217;t even make the top 25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DC</title>
		<link>http://statastic.com/2006/08/09/who-is-the-wikipedi-est-of-them-all/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://statastic.com/2006/08/09/who-is-the-wikipedi-est-of-them-all/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>Of course this analysis ignores the law of diminishing returns, as you get more entries in a language, fewer are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course this analysis ignores the law of diminishing returns, as you get more entries in a language, fewer are needed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
